Analysis Of Writers Paulo Frei Essay -- essays research papers

Perspectives in the contrivancesThe stories behind a piece of art be infinite. The reasons the artist produced the piece is provided single explanation behind the work. even so so, who is to know the specific thoughts the artist was thinking at the time? As each art critic may conclude his own epitome of an artwork, who is right and who is wrong? Just as scholarly persons ch anyenge the cultivation that is supposedly deposited in them by the teacher in the classroom setting, art ch everyenges the belief- that breeding can only be employ as it was intended, which is highly belieflistic in our day and age. The concept of perspectivism falls into place in this scenario. Art is perceived divergently by varying individuals. There can be millions of interpretations that exist for one piece of artwork, however none more or less correct than the next interpretation. Similar to teachers depositing entropy to the students, each student may receive the information in divers(pre nominal) contexts. Whose to say whether or not the students interpretation is wrong? As writer John Berger points pop the concept of reproducing art, in his essay Ways of Seeing, he addresses the idea how perspectives switch over completely when an artwork is reproduced to be used in a polar context. As this is done, new thoughts and interpretations are created, thus can be seen as a advanceance of ideas. Writer Paulo Freire used the idea that noesis emerges only through invention and re-invention(Freire 348) in his essay, The Banking Concept of Education. This idea is the essence of what Berger is nerve-wracking to point out through the reproducing of art. That the reproduction of art is basically the re-invention of the ideas and interpretations that already exist. And thus only through the re-invention of art, new ideas and new interpretations can be formed, a progression of ideas, achieving true knowledge.Art becomes information of a sort, and, like all information, it is either put to use or ignored(Berger 120). Each individual sees art differently, images become information that is incorporated with the individuals own knowledge and personality. As art is reproduced over and over again in different contexts, the artists current purpose of the image is altered, a progression from old ideas to new ideas. Clearly one can see how the original intended purp... ... of an image, even more ideas and thoughts are evoked. These reproductions now represented in new contexts bear new ideas that are to looked upon in a different manner for these images, like all information, see to hold their own against all the other information being continually transmitted(Berger 123).The idea that surrounds an image having one clear message has been proved to be obsolete. Information cannot be used in one single manner. Matter of fact, there are vertical too many variables regarding perspectivism, individuality, and personal knowledge that prohibits a single idea that is to be received universally. Bergers reproduction of art only further implicates the ideas that already exists, and takes it to the next level of thinking, incorporating new ideas that originally may have had no relevance whatsoever, the progression of ideas, so to speak. As art challenges the belief- that information can only be used as it was intended, the conclusion is that information can be used in innumerable ways. Information was meant to be challenged, evoking new challenges and new thoughts and ideas in a never ending unit of ammunition of progression from old to new.