dynamics of groups :: essays research papers

In the beginning, God made an individual - and accordingly he made a pair. The pair formed a company, together they begat others and thusly the company grew. Unfortunately, working in a group led to friction, the group disintegrated in conflict and Caian settled in the land of Nod - at that place has been trouble with groups ever since. When people work in groups, there are two quite separate issues involved. The first is the task and the problems involved in getting the job done. Frequently this is the only issue which the group considers. The sulfur is the process of the group work itself the mechanisms by which the group acts as a unit and non as a loose rabble. However, without due trouble to this process the value of the group can be diminished or even destroyed yet with a little explicit attention of the process, it can enhance the worth of the group to be many clock the sum of the worth of its individuals. It is this synergy which makes group work attractive in cor porate organization despite the possible problems (and time spent) in group formation. This article examines the group process and how it can best be utilized. The give away is that the group should be viewed as an important resource whose maintenance must(prenominal) be managed just like any other resource and that this prudence should be undertaken by the group itself so that it forms a normal break in of the groups activities. What is a Group? A group of people working in the same room, or even on a common project, does not necessarily invoke the group process. If the group is managed in a completely autocratic manner, there may be little opportunity for fundamental interaction relating to the work if there is factioning within the group, the process may never evolve. On the other hand, the group process may be utilized by normally distant individuals working on different projects for instance, at IEE colloquia. In simple terms, the group process leads to a spirit of coopera tion, coordination and commonly understand procedures and mores. If this is present within a group of people, then their performance willing be enhanced by their mutual support (both practical and moral). If you moot this is a nebulous concept when applied to the world of industry, consider the glacial effect that a self-opinionated, cantankerous loud-mouth would have on your performance and then contrast that to working with a friendly, open, helpful associate.